shouldiselfhost?they tell you if you can — we tell you if you should
THE DECISION LAYER FOR SELF-HOSTING100 APPS UNDER COVERAGEPROTOCOL v1NO VENDOR HAS EVER PAID FOR A RATING
§
AI-TOOLS
Grammarly logo

Should I self-host Grammarly?

$12/mo · Pro · alternative: LanguageTool
RATING
KINDA
OUTLOOK
NOT ASSIGNED
RATIONALE

LanguageTool's server boots in seconds and the browser extension points at it with one setting — grammar and style rules without shipping every keystroke to a cloud. But Grammarly's AI rewrites are genuinely a tier above. Worth it if privacy is the point; not if the AI editor is.

WHAT YOU LOSE
01

GrammarlyGO rewriting and tone suggestions

02

The premium rule-sets (LanguageTool's own premium exists for that)

WHAT YOU'RE PAYING FOR

grammar & spelling checks · style suggestions · browser integration

Self-Hosting Facts
1 app per panel · Grammarly
Assumes 1 seat on 1 always-on box you already run
Amount per month% of sub *
Subscription$12.00
VPS share0.504%
Storage + backup0.000%
Your hours · 10 min @ $203.3328%
Self-hosted all-in3.8332%
Effective markup3.1×
Setup · 11 min measured$3.67 once
Break-even0.4 months
VERDICT
KINDA
OUTLOOK
NOT ASSIGNED

* Percent of the subscription price. Your time is priced at the slider's rate — $0/h ("my homelab time is free and I love it") is a legitimate position. Every number is derived from the record, never hand-written. Price source, checked 2026-08-06.

Runs comfortably on a real VPS (2 GB+).

01
ALTERNATIVES
Ranked alternatives
01LanguageTool logo
LanguageToolThe grammar and style engine behind the browser add-on, running on your own machine, with nothing you write leaving it.
languagetool-org/languagetool · ★ 14,785 · 46d
LanguageTool running from the boot-verified compose file
LanguageTool, running from the compose file on this page — screenshot from our verified instance, not marketing material.
02
EVIDENCE
PROTOCOL
v1
VERIFIED BY
zernonia
REVIEWED
10 AUG 2026
SETUP MEASURED
11 MIN
AI ASSISTANT
CLAUDE-CODE · STATED
WHAT BROKE
01

Boot to healthy measured at 20s on the 2GB reference env

THE TESTED COMPOSE FILE — CI-BOOTED WEEKLY
# LanguageTool — grammar server the browser extension can point at
services:
  languagetool:
    image: erikvl87/languagetool:latest
    container_name: languagetool
    restart: unless-stopped
    environment:
      Java_Xms: 256m
      Java_Xmx: 1g
    ports:
      - "8103:8010"
    healthcheck:
      test: ["CMD-SHELL", "wget -qO- 'http://localhost:8010/v2/languages' >/dev/null || exit 1"]
      interval: 5s
      timeout: 10s
      retries: 30
      start_period: 30s

Want a guided install instead? caniselfhostit.com/grammarly has AI-agent prompts that assume a bare machine — that's their half of the stool, and it's good.

FULL TIMED LOG
# Grammarly — verdict log

- **Date:** 2026-08-10
- **Verdict:** KINDA — worth it if…
- **Protocol:** v1 (2GB reference env, Docker preinstalled, AI assistant: claude-code)

## Setup evidence

- Compose: `compose/grammarly-languagetool.yml`
- Boot to healthy: **20s** measured this session
- Setup time recorded: 11 min (boot + configuration to first working workflow)

## What broke / notes

- Boot to healthy measured at 20s on the 2GB reference env

## The call

LanguageTool's server boots in seconds and the browser extension points at it with one setting — grammar and style rules without shipping every keystroke to a cloud. But Grammarly's AI rewrites are genuinely a tier above. Worth it if privacy is the point; not if the AI editor is.
03
HISTORY
10 AUG 2026UNRATED → KINDAInitial verdict: LanguageTool's server boots in seconds and the browser extension points at it with one setting — grammar and s.