shouldiselfhost?they tell you if you can — we tell you if you should
THE DECISION LAYER FOR SELF-HOSTING100 APPS UNDER COVERAGEPROTOCOL v1NO VENDOR HAS EVER PAID FOR A RATING
§
MONITORING
Pingdom logo

Should I self-host Pingdom?

$18/mo · Synthetic Monitoring · 10 uptime checks · alternative: Gatus
RATING
YES
OUTLOOK
NOT ASSIGNED
RATIONALE

Uptime Kuma boots in seconds, checks HTTP/TCP/DNS/ping, pages you through ntfy or Telegram, and replaces the entire Pingdom bill. Monitoring your uptime from a box you control is the one recursion self-hosting handles fine — put it on a different provider than what it watches.

WHAT YOU LOSE
01

Multi-region probes — Kuma checks from one vantage point unless you federate it

02

Pingdom's RUM and transaction checks

WHAT YOU'RE PAYING FOR

uptime checks (HTTP/TCP/ping) · alerting on downtime · status pages · response-time history

Self-Hosting Facts
1 app per panel · Pingdom
Assumes 1 seat on 1 always-on box you already run
Amount per month% of sub *
Subscription$18.00
VPS share0.302%
Storage + backup0.000%
Your hours · 10 min @ $203.3319%
Self-hosted all-in3.6320%
Effective markup5.0×
Setup · 11 min measured$3.67 once
Break-even0.3 months
VERDICT
YES
OUTLOOK
NOT ASSIGNED

* Percent of the subscription price. Your time is priced at the slider's rate — $0/h ("my homelab time is free and I love it") is a legitimate position. Every number is derived from the record, never hand-written. Price source, checked 2026-08-06.

Runs comfortably on a Raspberry Pi.

01
ALTERNATIVES
Ranked alternatives
01Gatus logo
GatusA public status page whose entire configuration is one YAML file you own: the checks, the pass conditions and the alerting, declared once and served as a page.
TwiN/gatus · ★ 11,772 · 2d
02Uptime Kuma logo
Uptime KumaUptime monitoring and status pages from one container, with no monitor quota and no per-check billing.
louislam/uptime-kuma · ★ 90,062 · 0d
Gatus running from the boot-verified compose file
Gatus, running from the compose file on this page — screenshot from our verified instance, not marketing material.
02
EVIDENCE
PROTOCOL
v1
VERIFIED BY
zernonia
REVIEWED
10 AUG 2026
SETUP MEASURED
11 MIN
AI ASSISTANT
CLAUDE-CODE · STATED
WHAT BROKE
01

Boot to healthy measured at 25s on the 2GB reference env

THE TESTED COMPOSE FILE — CI-BOOTED WEEKLY
# Uptime Kuma — status monitoring; image ships its own healthcheck binary
services:
  uptime-kuma:
    image: louislam/uptime-kuma:1
    container_name: uptime-kuma
    restart: unless-stopped
    ports:
      - "3001:3001"
    volumes:
      - kuma-data:/app/data
    healthcheck:
      test: ["CMD", "extra/healthcheck"]
      interval: 5s
      timeout: 30s
      retries: 30
      start_period: 30s
volumes:
  kuma-data:

Want a guided install instead? caniselfhostit.com/pingdom has AI-agent prompts that assume a bare machine — that's their half of the stool, and it's good.

FULL TIMED LOG
# Pingdom — verdict log

- **Date:** 2026-08-10
- **Verdict:** YES — worth it
- **Protocol:** v1 (2GB reference env, Docker preinstalled, AI assistant: claude-code)

## Setup evidence

- Compose: `compose/pingdom-uptime-kuma.yml`
- Boot to healthy: **25s** measured this session
- Setup time recorded: 11 min (boot + configuration to first working workflow)

## What broke / notes

- Boot to healthy measured at 25s on the 2GB reference env

## The call

Uptime Kuma boots in seconds, checks HTTP/TCP/DNS/ping, pages you through ntfy or Telegram, and replaces the entire Pingdom bill. Monitoring your uptime from a box you control is the one recursion self-hosting handles fine — put it on a different provider than what it watches.
03
HISTORY
10 AUG 2026UNRATED → YESInitial verdict: Uptime Kuma boots in seconds, checks HTTP/TCP/DNS/ping, pages you through ntfy or Telegram, and replaces the e.