shouldiselfhost?they tell you if you can — we tell you if you should
THE DECISION LAYER FOR SELF-HOSTING100 APPS UNDER COVERAGEPROTOCOL v1NO VENDOR HAS EVER PAID FOR A RATING
RECENT ACTIONS 1PASSWORDNOT REALLY·ACTIVECAMPAIGNKINDA·ACUITY SCHEDULINGYES·ADOBE ACROBATYES·ADOBE LIGHTROOMNOT REALLY·AIRTABLEYES·AMPLITUDEYES·ANYLISTNOT REALLY·ASANAKINDA
VS
HEAD-TO-HEAD
Activepieces logo

Activepieces vs Automatisch

Automatisch logo

Compared on data, not vibes. Metrics refresh nightly; verdict links carry the math.

ACTIVEPIECESAUTOMATISCH
GITHUB STARS23,71013,928
LAST COMMIT0d ago180d ago
LATEST RELEASE0.87.0v0.15.0
DOCKER PULLS——
LICENSEMITAGPL-3.0
MIN RAM4,096 MB2,048 MB
CONTAINERS34
ARM (PI-FRIENDLY)yesyes
01
BACKS
ACTIVEPIECES BACKS THESE RATINGS

Trigger-and-action automation with a visual builder, run on your own box, with no task meter.

Make logoMakeKINDAZapier logoZapierYES
AUTOMATISCH BACKS THESE RATINGS

Trigger-and-action flows on your own box, with a connector list you can count and no credit meter.

Make logoMakeKINDA

Neither page tells you which is “better” — they solve the same jobs differently. Pick by the constraint that binds you: RAM, ARM, license, or how alive the project looks.