Castopod vs 
PeerTube
Compared on data, not vibes. Metrics refresh nightly; verdict links carry the math.
| Castopod | PeerTube | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | 863 | 15,246 |
| Last commit | 66d ago | 0d ago |
| Latest release | — | v8.2.4 |
| Docker pulls | 169,151 | — |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Min RAM | 2,048 MB | 2,048 MB |
| Containers | 3 | 3 |
| ARM (Pi-friendly) | yes | yes |
Castopod
Podcast hosting on a domain you own: your feed, your audio files, your download numbers, and no monthly download meter.
Backs these verdicts
PeerTube
A video site of your own, with the player, the embed codes and the transcoding, on a server whose bandwidth bill is yours.
Backs these verdicts
Neither page tells you which is "better" — they solve the same jobs differently. Pick by the constraint that binds you: RAM, ARM, license, or how alive the project looks.